Tuesday, May 15, 2018

A Controversial and Emotional Question Surrounding Marriage...


At the church where I serve, we are in a sermon series entitled “Love and Marriage”, where we are asking and answering four questions surrounding the issue of marriage: “What is marriage?” “Does marriage matter to Jesus?” “What is marriage for?” And “How are we to handle conflict in marriage?” And as we go through this series, our hope and our prayer is that God would move by the power of the Holy Spirit to enable us to wrap our heads, hearts, and hands around the answers to these questions in a way that result in us being able to experience the love and marriage that we were designed to experience.

This week, I would like for us to ask and answer the question “Does marriage matter to Jesus?” And to answer that question, I would like for us to spend our time together looking at an event from history that has been preserved and recorded for us in an account of Jesus life in the Bible called the gospel of Matthew. And it is in this event from history that we will discover the timeless answer to the question “Does marriage matter to Jesus?”  So, let’s discover the answer to that question together, beginning in Matthew 19:3:

Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?"

Matthew begins this section of his account of Jesus life by giving us a front row seat to a confrontation that Jesus had with a group of people who were known as the Pharisees. Now the Pharisee’s were a group of self-righteous religious leaders who led of one of the largest religious denominations of the Jewish people during Jesus day. The Pharisees were aware that Jesus had grown in popularity in the eyes of the Jewish people. And as a result of His growing popularity, Jesus was viewed as a threat by the Pharisees to their position and power that they loved.

And it was in this context that Matthew tells us that some Pharisees came to Jesus to test Him with a question. Now when Matthew uses the word test here, this word means to attempt to trap someone through the process of inquiry. In other words, this group of self-righteous religious leaders hoped to trap Jesus with a question. The Pharisees hoped that Jesus response to their question that would undermine His credibility with the Jewish people. The Pharisees hoped that Jesus answer to their question would give them the opportunity to bolster their position and popularity with the Jewish people.

So, the Pharisees asked a question that they believed would be controversial enough and emotional enough to drive the crowds away from Jesus and toward them: "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?" Now this question, if communicated in the language we use in our culture today, would have sounded something like this: Is it right and proper for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all? Is it ever okay to get a divorce?”

Now here is a question to consider: Do you think that this question is controversial? Do you think this question provokes strong emotions? Do you think that this question provokes strong opinions? You see, the emotional and controversial subject of divorce and remarriage is not new. Divorce and remarriage has been an emotional and controversial subject throughout human history.

And now, the Pharisees were attempting to get Jesus to weigh in on the debate in hopes that His answer would undermine His growing popularity and credibility with the crowds that were following Him. Matthew records for us how Jesus answered this question that was designed to trap Him in verse 4-6:

And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, 5 and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH '? 6 "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."

Matthew tells us that Jesus began to answer their question with the phrase “Have you not read”. When Jesus uses this phrase, this was Jesus way of basically saying “You should know that answer to this question because you position yourselves as the self-righteous religious experts. You should know that answer to this question because you already have the answer to this question but obviously you have not read the Bible like you should have read the Bible so that you could see the answer to your question which is right in front of your face.”

Jesus then revealed the answer to their question which was right in front of their face by quoting from a section of the very first letter in the Bible called the book of Genesis. Jesus quoted from Genesis 1:27, which we looked at last week and which referred to the creation of humanity. And in God’s creation of humanity, “God made them male and female”. What is so interesting here is that Jesus did not quote all of Genesis 1:27. Here is what all of Genesis 1:27 states:

God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

Instead of quoting all of Genesis 1:27, Jesus quotes the last phrase of Genesis 1:27 from the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament. But why would Jesus only quote the last phrase of Genesis 1:27? You see, Jesus quoted the last phrase of Genesis 1:27, as the last phrase of Genesis 1:27 highlighted the differences between men and women. As we talked about last week, Genesis 1:27 reveals the reality that in God’s design, men and women have equal value and worth as being created in God’s relational image.

Jesus here is highlighting the reality that in God’s design, there is a distinctiveness between men and women in the midst of the equality of men and women in God’s sight. After quoting the last phrase of Genesis 1:27, Jesus quoted Genesis 2:24. But notice the words that occur between the two quotes. Notice the words “and said”. Jesus here shows the causal linkage between the last phrase of Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 2:24 to reveal the reality that God created men and women with distinctiveness that was to be united in marriage in a way that those distinctive features between a man and a woman would complement one another in a lifelong commitment to one another.

Jesus pointed to this linkage to point out that “For this reason”; in other words, because it is not good for man to be alone in his unique distinctiveness; because it is not good for a woman to be alone in her unique distinctiveness; a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife and they shall become one flesh. Jesus point here is that marriage is an institution that was created by God by which a man and woman cut the cord, so to speak, from their parents and join together in a covenant commitment that involves one man and one woman for one lifetime and become one flesh, in a relationship that is marked by vulnerability, transparency and intimacy.

Jesus was reinforcing the reality that marriage is not a legal contract where two parties agree to do certain things for each other and make promises about how they will conduct their life together that can be dissolved at any time. Instead, marriage is a covenant commitment that can only be revoked through death of one of the parties or by one of the parties entering into another covenant agreement. Jesus was reinforcing the reality that marriage is not just sexual in nature.  And Jesus was reinforcing the reality that marriage is not just personal in nature. Jesus was reinforcing the reality that marriage, according to God’s design, is not simply about love, or sex, or a legal piece of paper. Instead, Jesus was reinforcing God’s design for marriage as being about bringing the distinctiveness of a man and a woman together to complement one another by uniting them together in a covenant commitment for their lifetime.

And because of that reality, in verse 6 Jesus proclaimed "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." Now what is so interesting here is that the phrase “let no man separate” is a command. In other words, Jesus responded to the question by the Pharisees by giving them a command concerning marriage. And that command was that no man was to separate, or divide into two, what God had made into one as a result of the covenant commitment that had been made before God and man.

So, Jesus not only answered their question by pointing to God’s design for marriage. In addition, Jesus doubled down on God’s design for marriage by commanding that no one should get between a man and woman who have become married.

Tomorrow, we will see Matthew reveal how the Pharisees responded to Jesus…

No comments:

Post a Comment