Wednesday, February 27, 2019

An example of elevating a man-made rule over God's commands...


This week we are looking at an event from history that is recorded in a section of an account of Jesus life that is recorded for us in the Bible called the gospel of Mark. Yesterday we looked on as the Pharisees and some of the scribes had made the trip from Jerusalem to northern Israel to check up on Jesus. And as they came to check up on Jesus, Mark tells us that these self-righteous religious leaders saw that some of Jesus disciples were eating their bread with impure hands, that is, unwashed.

We talked about the reality that the issue was not that Jesus disciples were eating with dirty hands. Instead, we discovered that because the priests were entering into the very presence of the Lord in the Tabernacle, the priests were required to carefully wash their hands and feet so that they would be ceremonially clean as they served as a minister to the Lord. However, while this command was only given to the priests who would be entering into the tabernacle to serve and minister to the Lord in the presence of the Lord, in Jesus day, this command that had been given by the Lord to the priests had been extended to be required of every Jewish person according to the oral tradition what was taught by the Jewish religious leaders of the day.

Thus, the Jewish religious leaders had created a man-made law and elevated it as being as equal to the commands of God. And as these religious leaders observed Jesus disciples not following the traditions and laws that they had made for the Jewish people to observe, they responded by questioning and challenging Jesus as to why He would allow His disciples to disobey their commands, which they viewed as being as equal to God’s commands.

Mark tells us that Jesus responded to the question by accusing the Pharisees and scribes of being hypocrites. The word hypocrite, when used in Jesus day, referred to one who was an actor or a pretender. In our culture today, we would refer to such a person as a poser. A hypocrite creates a public impression that is at odds with one’s real motivation or purpose. A hypocrite fails to follow the message and teachings that they impose on others. Jesus point behind His accusation was that the Pharisees were hypocrites because they were giving an appearance to the Jewish people about where they were at in their relationship with God that was at odds with where they were truly at in their relationship with God.

Jesus backed His accusation by quoting from a section of a letter that is recorded for us in the Old Testament of the Bible called the book of Isaiah. Jesus was exposing the reality that the Pharisees and scribes were focused on forcing others to be obedient to their man-made rules while being disobedient, and leading the Jewish people to be disobedient, to God’s rules. After quoting from Isaiah, Jesus hammered His accusation home by proclaiming that the Pharisees and scribes were neglecting, or abandoning, the commandment of God. Instead the Pharisees and scribes were focused on holding fast to the tradition of men that they had turned into commandments of men that held equal weight to God’s commands. After accusing the Pharisees and scribes of hypocrisy, we see Jesus provide an example of their hypocrisy in Mark 7:9-13:

 He was also saying to them, "You are experts at setting aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition. 10 "For Moses said, 'HONOR YOUR FATHER AND YOUR MOTHER'; and, 'HE WHO SPEAKS EVIL OF FATHER OR MOTHER, IS TO BE PUT TO DEATH'; 11 but you say, 'If a man says to his father or his mother, whatever I have that would help you is Corban (that is to say, given to God),' 12 you no longer permit him to do anything for his father or his mother; 13 thus invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down; and you do many things such as that."

Jesus provided an example where the Pharisees and scribes demonstrated that they were experts at setting aside, or rejecting the commandment of God as being invalid, in order to validate their manmade religious rules and traditions, by quoting from another section of the book of Exodus. In Exodus 20:12, as the fifth of the ten commandments, God had commanded the Jewish people to honor their father and mother. In addition, in Exodus 21:17, God commanded the Jewish people that anyone who spoke evil of their father or mother was to be put to death.

However, the Jewish people of Jesus day had made a man-made religious rule that 'If a man says to his father or his mother, whatever I have that would help you is Corban. Now a natural question that could arise here is “What does that even mean? Now the word corban refers to an offering that was made to God. You see, what would happen is that a Jewish person would make a vow, by using this phrase, that would place a ban on an object so that it could not be used for anything except a sacred use for God. This vow would result in the object being vowed being viewed as an offering dedicated to God and forbidden to be used for anything other than God.

In Jesus day, when a man declared his property as being corban to his parents, he neither promised it to the temple or prohibited its use to himself. Instead he would be legally excluding his parents from any ability to have access or receive any benefit from it. However, if the son later regretted the vow that he made, under the tradition of the Elders he was not allowed to change the vow that he had made.

And because of that reality, the Pharisees and scribes of Jesus day had invalidated God’s clear commands by elevating their man-made rules to the status of being equal to God’s rules. Jesus provided this example to point to the reality that God did not give humanity the authority to increase and add to the commands and demands that He has given humanity. Jesus point is that God is the only one who has the right to make laws about following Him and demand that we obey those laws about following Him. Jesus point is that no human being has the right to make laws that they demand obedience to that is equal to the obedience the God demands when it comes to His laws.

Jesus then hammed His point by telling a parable. Now a parable is an earthy story that is designed to reveal a deeper spiritual truth. So let’s look at this parable together in verse 14-16:

 After He called the crowd to Him again, He began saying to them, "Listen to Me, all of you, and understand: 15 there is nothing outside the man which can defile him if it goes into him; but the things which proceed out of the man are what defile the man. 16 "If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear."

Now when Jesus used the word defile here, this word, in the language that this letter was originally written in, literally means to make common or impure. If Jesus was telling this parable in the language that we use in our culture today, this parable would have sounded something like this: “Hey listen up and pay attention because this is important. There is nothing outside of anyone that can cause someone to be impure spiritually. Instead, it is what comes out of you that reveals the reality that you are already impure spiritually.”

Now I want us to take a minute an imagine ourselves as one of Jesus followers listening to this confrontation. You have grown up your whole life learning not only the commandments of God, but also the traditions of the Elders. You have grown up your whole life with a list of rules that clearly came from God that you needed to follow, along with a list of rules that came from the religious leaders that you needed to follow in order to be right with God. You grew up your whole life with an understanding that the rules that came from the religious leaders needed to be followed because they helped make sure that you obeyed the rules that came from God.

And now you have just heard Jesus accuse the religious leaders of your day of creating man-made religious rules that actually resulted in you breaking the rules of God, not obeying the rules of God. Now you are one of Jesus followers. What would you be thinking? How would you be feeling? How would you respond?

Friday, we will look at the disciple’s response...

No comments:

Post a Comment