Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Debating the Creation...


This week, we are looking at the opening chapter of the very first book in the bible called the book of Genesis. Yesterday we discovered that,  unlike Eastern religions; unlike the New Age Movement; unlike monism and pantheism, God and creation are not one essence that are intertwined with one another. The Bible teaches us that there is a Creator and there is a creation and that the Creator is distinct and separate from the creation. There is only one God and you and I or any other created thing is not God. “In the beginning God”. Today, with that in mind, let’s look at all of Genesis 1:1:

            In the beginning God created the heavens and
           the earth.

Now that leads us to a first and obvious question that has been asked by all of humanity throughout history. And that question is this: How? How did God create the Heavens and earth? We begin to find answers to that question beginning in verse 2:

 The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters.

Moses records for us that God created the heavens and the earth and that the earth was formless and void. But this morning, why would Moses say that the earth was formless and void after God created the heavens and earth? At first glance, that does not seem to make sense, does it? Here we see Moses revealing for us the reality that God’s first creative act was to create the materials that would be used to create the heavens and the earth.

Think of it this way. Prior to Genesis 1:1, there was nothing else that existed except for God. Nothing. In Genesis 1:1 God created the elements that make up the universe that we live in. In Genesis 1:2, Moses is recording that the elements that God would later use to create the universe were formless and void. It is kind of like this glob of play dough here. At this point, this play dough is just a glob of play dough. It has no form and it is devoid of any meaning and purpose. It is just here existing. That is what has happened in Genesis 1:1-2. Out of nothing God has created the elements that He will later shape into what we not know as the universe, which Moses refers to as the heavens and the earth.

Now this leads us to another aspect of the question “How did God create the heavens and the earth?” And that aspect involves the time it took God to create the universe and how old the universe actually is. Amongst people who have read and studied the Bible, there are six prominent views when it comes to the time that God took in creating the universe.

The reason that there are six views is due to two reasons. First, the word used for beginning in Genesis 1:1, in Hebrew, simply marks a starting point for what comes afterwards. This word does not denote any specific length of time, nor does it mean that the next thing follows immediately. In addition, the Hebrew word for day, yom, can refer to either a literal 24 hour day or a period of time. And since both of these words can be ambiguous, it has led to a great deal of debate and to six different views of how God created the universe.

So I just want to take a minute to explain what these views are and how they relate to what the Bible teaches regarding how God created the universe. The first view is referred to as Historic Creationism. This view holds that what God created in Genesis 1:1 existed for an undefined period of time before God began preparing the uninhabited universe as a functioning system. God first created the stuff that would be used in creation from nothing and then shaped that stuff into something. This view holds that the preparation of the uncultivated land and the creation of Adam and Eve occurred in six literal 24 hour days. So this view leaves the possibility of an old earth, six literal days of creation, and a young humanity on an old earth.

The second view is referred to as Young Earth creationism. In this view God created the entire universe, including Adam and Eve, in six literal 24 hour days. This view affirms that the universe is less than ten thousand years old and interprets the data of science in terms of Scripture and does not compromise God’s teaching about the date and divine methods of creation with naturalistic scientific theories.

The third view is referred to as the Gap Theory. This view maintains that a first creation occurred perhaps a billion years ago, then, a catastrophic event, likely the fall of Satan, left the earth in the destroyed condition of Genesis 1:2. God responded to the disaster by recreating the earth as recorded in Genesis 1:3-27. So the earth is old from the 1st creation and mankind is young because of the recent creation. The problem with this view is that the Bible does not speak of two creations. Also at the end of the six days of creation, God declared all that He had made “very good” which does not correlate with the claim that He made the earth very bad and destroyed.

A fourth view is referred to as the literary framework view. In this view Genesis 1 and 2 are intended to be read as a figurative framework explaining creation in a topical, not sequential, order. The six days of creation, according to this view, are to be interpreted metaphorically. The problem, however, is that even when God uses figurative language in the Bible, it does so to communicate a literal truth, which is not what this view does when it comes to creation.

A fifth view is referred to as the Day/Age view. In this view, God created the universe, including Adam and Eve, in six sequential periods of time that are geologic ages, not literal 24 hour periods of time. The biggest problem with this view is that the order of events in the six days is not the same order as held by old-earth science. For example, the sun appears on day four, which contradicts the scientific view of creation. Another problem with this view is that the six days of creation seem to be six literal days, which we will see in a minute.  

A sixth view is referred to as Theistic Evolution. Theistic evolution maintains that God essentially began creation and then stopped working directly with creation to instead work through evolution. This view has three huge problems. First, it inherits all the scientific impossibilities of evolution as a theory of origins. Second, evolution teaches that one species evolves into other species, while Genesis 1 teaches that each species had offspring “according to its kind”, not another kind, as evolution postulates. The scientific data actually agrees with Genesis on the impossibility of one species evolving into another. And third, the rest of Scripture portrays God as being continually involved in the details of creation, not indirectly involved.

Now this is where the meaning of the Hebrew word for day comes into play. If you believe that the six days are literal 24 hour days, then you must accept either historic creationism, young earth creationism, or the gap theory as how God created the heavens and the earth. However, if you believe that the six days are not literal 24 hour days, then you must accept one of the last three views of creation, which are the literary framework, day/age view, or theistic evolution.

So how can we tell which of these views is right? When we read the story of creation in the Bible, which we will do in a minute, it seems apparent that the six days are six literal days. We will see that each day is numbered so that there is a succession of days, with morning and an evening, which is the common vernacular for a day. In addition, in a section of another letter in the Bible called the book of Exodus, we see God say the following to Moses in Exodus 20:8:

"Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. "Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath of the LORD your God; in it you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter, your male or your female servant or your cattle or your sojourner who stays with you. "For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day and made it holy.

In God’s command to the Jewish people to remember the Sabbath, God’s creative work is set as a precedent for us. God Himself, speaks of the creation as being in six literal 24 hour days. So what view is the right view? Here is a question to help you think through this issue: Did Adam and Eve have a belly button? Did Adam and Eve have to have a belly button? Do you think God created Adam and Eve as babies and said good luck surviving? Do you think that God created plants as seeds that had to grow into plants to produce fruit? 

I believe that both Young Earth Creationism and historic creationism align with what the Bible teaches regarding God’s creation of the Heavens and the earth. Young earth creationism faithfully communicates God’s creative activity as recorded in the first chapter of the book of Genesis and also does not contradict scientific evidence, such as carbon dating, because the Bible states that God created the universe as a fully functioning and mature system that was ready and able to sustain the creation.

And Historic creationism,  which holds that what God created in Genesis 1:1 existed for an undefined period of time before God began preparing the uninhabited universe as a functioning system, which occurred in six literal 24 hour days also faithfully communicates God’s creative activity as recorded in the first chapter of the book of Genesis and also does not contradict scientific evidence, as this view leaves the possibility of an old earth, six literal days of creation, and a young humanity on an old earth.

And more importantly how God created the universe is an open handed issue. What is a closed handed issue is that God did create the universe from nothing. Since no one was around when God created the universe, whether young earth or historic creationism is right we will not know until we go to be with Jesus.

What I find so interesting is that the people in the Bible were far more concerned about knowing who God was than how God did. The Bible was not written by God as a scientific textbook to explain every detail of God’s creative process. Instead the Bible was written as God’s revelation to humanity of Him being the Creator and sustainer of the universe.

Tomorrow, with that in mind we will look at how God created the universe…

No comments:

Post a Comment