How many
of us have questions that we would like to ask God? How many of us have doubts
about God that lead us to be skeptical about God? How many of us, if we are
really honest, would say that there are times, maybe many times, where we are
skeptical about God and even question if there is a God?
Maybe I
have just described you. Maybe you do not buy the whole Jesus, Bible, church
thing. You are not sure about whether or not there is a God, let alone whether
you should follow Him or live for Him. Or maybe you would
say that while you believe that there is a God, you are skeptical about what
people who say they are Christians claim about God and what they say about how
God acts or does not act in the world or in the circumstances that people
experience in their day to day lives. Or maybe you are a follower of Jesus, but
find yourself with questions about God and how He acts or does not act in the
world that cause you to struggle with skepticism.
During
the next several weeks we are going to spend our time looking at eight
questions that those who are skeptical of Christianity pose as a challenge to
the Christian faith. And as we go through this series, my hope and prayer is
that we would address these eight questions that challenge Christianity in way
that engages the skepticism that these questions provoke and provide answers that serve to develop
confidence and convictions about God and His character and activity in the
world around us.
This week, I would like for us to ask and answer the
question “Is belief in God rational?” In other words, is it reasonable or
rational to believe in God? Or is the idea of God irrational?
Now when it comes to the question “Is belief in God
rational?”, as Bill Kynes points out, many people tend to approach the question
of whether there is God in the same what that they would approach the question
“is the earth round?” In other words, many people want to approach the question
of God’s existence with the same approach that they would use to determine
something scientifically or to prove something logically.
And because of this reality, the guiding assumption
that drives many people in their search for an answer to the question of the
existence of God is that only standard that can be used to answer the question
of God’s existence is the scientific method. In other words, for many people,
the driving assumption that drives their search for the answer to the question
of God’s existence is that only what can be known and proven scientifically
counts as being true.
But is that assumption true? Is only what can be known
and proven scientifically true? After all, we all claim to know that things
that are true that can in no way be proven by scientific methods. For example,
to claim that torturing babies is wrong is not something that can be proven
scientifically. As a matter of fact, any time we make any kind of moral
judgment we are making a statement that is outside the realm of what science
can demonstrate as being true.
Even ardent atheists agree with this reality. For
example, Richard Dawkins stated “Science has no method for determining what is
ethical”. In addition, is it even reasonable to expect that science could prove
that God exists? After all science is about understanding what exists in the
material universe. However, no one thinks that God exists as an object in this
material universe as something that can be observed and measured. Instead, God
exists outside this universe.
Also, there are other things that we believe exist but
cannot be measured scientifically. For example, can you see an object called
love? Does love exist as a material object that you can see and purchase at
Wal-Mart? Can you measure love with a Geiger counter? Can you measure justice
with a thermometer? No, you can’t. And in a similar way, scientific methodology
is not equipped to determine or prove God.
Now a natural question that arises here is “Well Dave,
if science cannot be used to provide determinative proof of God’s existence,
then what about logic or philosophy?” If
that question is running through your mind, I just want to let you know that
you are asking a great question. And while there are many philosophers who have
tried to answer the question of God’s existence through logic and philosophy,
even most Christian philosophers concede that there is no singular argument
from philosophy or logic that conclusively demonstrates that God exists.
But, if science and philosophy cannot prove the
existence of God, then where does that leave us? So is it irrational to believe
in God? Is belief in God unreasonable for rational people? While there is no
singular argument that conclusively proves the existence of God, there are many
pointers to God. In other words, there are many arguments that provide a
persuasive and rational reason for the existence of God. So I want us to look at five of these
pointers that point us to the existence of God.
The first pointer is the pointer of existence. The
pointer of existence addresses the question “why is there something rather than
nothing at all?” In other words, where did all this come from? What caused all
this? How did all this begin? Now a natural response to this question could be
“The Big Bang”. But where did the “Big Bang” come from?
I mean, is it reasonable and rational to think that
something really comes from nothing? And there is something within all of us
intuitively that senses that the answer to that question is no, something does
not come from nothing. You see, God is the one necessary being- God is the
uncaused cause of everything that exists.
Now it is important to understand that this argument from existence is
not proof of God. People could argue, for example, that matter has always
existed. But that position contradicts the widely held conviction that if
things can either exist or not exist, those things need to have a cause to come
into being so as to exist.
Now that leads us to the second pointer that points us
to God, which is the pointer of design. You see, not only does the question
“why is there something rather than nothing at all?” point us to the concept of
God, there is the question “Why do we fit in this world? Why does the universe
fit together and function the way it does?”
There seems to be some design to the universe and how
we fit into the universe. Even beyond the arguments that are made by science
through evolution and natural selection, science has not been able to
adequately explain the deep design that surrounds such things as the speed of
light, the force of gravity, and the irreducible complexity of our universe.
Now while some atheists, such as Richard Dawkins,
argue that this universe is just one of many universes and that ours simply has
the constants for us to be here, there is no way to prove that argument one way
of the other. The pointer of design points to the reality that the design of
the universe points to a designer of the universe.
And in a section
of a letter that is recorded for us in the New Testament of the Bible, called
the book of Romans, we see a man that we know today as the Apostle Paul point
to this pointer of design as an argument for the existence of God. So let’s
look at Paul’s argument together, beginning in Romans 1:18:
For the wrath
of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of
men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,
Now to fully understand what Paul is going to communicate
in these verses, we first need to wrap our minds around some of the 50 cent church
mumbo jumbo talk words that Paul uses here. When Paul uses the word wrath, this
word refers to God’s just and right response to selfish rebellion and sin. This
is God’s perfect justice resulting in a rightful response to the wrongdoing and
injustice of others.
In addition, when Paul uses the word revealed, he is
revealing for us the reality that the claims of Christ and the message of the
gospel makes fully known God’s just and right response to the selfishness and
rebellion of humanity. You see, for God to allow selfish rebellion and
injustice to go unpunished would make Him unjust. God’s very nature dictates a
response to rebellion and injustice. And God’s justice is revealed in the
gospel against all ungodliness and unrighteousness. Ungodliness, simply put, is
leaving God out. Ungodliness is a failure to acknowledge God and thus
dishonoring God by leaving God out. Ungodliness is not just horrible acts of
rebellion and sin; it is ignoring God.
The word unrighteous, simply put, is not being right with
God or the truth about God. Unrighteousness involves being at odds with God and
the truth about God that results in acts of selfish rebellion and sin. When
Paul uses the word suppress here, this word means to hold down or ignore
something. Paul’s point here is that God justly and rightly responds to
humanities failure to acknowledge God and being at odds with God as a result of
living our lives as though He does not exist.
Now a natural question that may arise here is “well Dave,
how do I suppress the truth about God? I mean to suppress or ignore something
requires evidence of that something. So what evidence is there that there is a
God that I am ignoring and living like He does not exist? Paul, anticipating
this question, provides the evidence to prove that humanity is guilty of
leaving God out and living as though He does not exist what he says next. So
let’s look at this piece of evidence together, which is found in Romans
1:19-23:
because that
which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to
them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal
power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what
has been made, so that they are without excuse. For even though they knew God,
they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their
speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they
became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in
the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling
creatures.
Here we see Paul reveal for us the reality that we
suppress the truth about the existence of God that is revealed within us when
it comes to the evidence from creation. When Paul uses the phrase that which is
known about God is evident, Paul is revealing for us the reality that God
clearly reveals the truth about His existence to all humanity through His
creative activity in the universe in a way that is understandable and can be
clearly seen.
But notice where Paul says God reveals the truth about
His existence; the clear and plain truth of God’s existence is within us. You
see, in the core of every human being is an intuitive sense that there is
something out there bigger and beyond us. Something within in us provokes a
clear and plain concept of a Creator. Paul then unpacks this further in verse
20 by explaining that since the creation of the universe, God’s character,
power, and nature have plainly and clearly been on display. God’s wisdom, God’s
might, God’s greatness, God’s goodness, and God’s creativity is evidenced in
the universe around us.
When Paul uses the words seen and understood here, he is
explaining that God’s existence has been noticed and perceived in a way that
has been grasped and comprehended by humanity throughout history as a result of
His activity of creating the universe. Across cultures and continents, across
calendars and centuries, humanity has been provoked to worship something that they
clearly comprehended as their creator.
And because of this intuitive perception that all
humanity experiences regarding the reality of the existence of something bigger
and beyond us, called God, all of humanity is without excuse. In other words,
no human being can say that they did not know that God exists, because the
evidence that God exists is overwhelming through the creation.
However, in verses 21-23 Paul explains that humanity
rejected the evidence of God’s existence through creation to instead chose the
path of foolishness. Humanity foolishly chose to refuse to live their lives in
a way that enhanced God’s reputation; instead they chose to ignore Him. Instead
of expressing appreciation for all the blessings and benefits that God gave
humanity within the creation, humanity foolishly chose to ignore Him.
While all of humanity was able to clearly perceive and
understand that God exists and created the universe, yet all of humanity
worthlessly rejected that truth and proceeded to live life as though God does
not exist. Instead of responding to the clear and plain evidence of God’s
existence has been perceived and comprehended through His creation by
worshipping God, all of humanity has foolishly chosen to worship the creation.
Whether it is in the image of an animal, the image of
position, the image of possession, or the image that we seen in the mirror, all
of humanity chooses to worship something other than God than God, which is
called idolatry. Paul here is pointing the readers of his letter to the pointer
of design.
Tomorrow, we will look at two more of these pointers that
point to the existence of God?
No comments:
Post a Comment