This week we
have been looking at a section of a letter that has been preserved and recorded
for us in the Bible called the book of 1 Peter. So far this week we have
discovered that living as part of God's Kingdom Community should lead to a life
that responds to suffering the right way. In 1 Peter 3:13-18, we discovered
that, as followers of Jesus, we respond to suffering the right way when suffer
for the right reasons. Today, we
will see Peter reveal for us the second way by which followers of Jesus respond
to suffering the right way in 1 Peter 3:18-20. Let’s look at it together:
For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust,
so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but
made alive in the spirit; 19 in which also He went and made
proclamation to the spirits now in
prison, 20 who once were disobedient, when the patience of God kept
waiting in the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a
few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water.
Now these verses are some of the most discussed and
debated verses in the entire Bible. As a matter of fact, many scholars view
these verses as being the most difficult verses to interpret in the entire
Bible. So with that in mind, let’s start where Peter starts in verse 18. After
calling followers of Jesus through history to respond to suffering the right
way for the right reasons, Peter provides a first example of a person who
responded to suffering the right way as He suffered for the right reason. And
that first example is Jesus.
What is so interesting is that the word died in verse 18,
in the language that this letter was originally written in, is the same that
has been translated suffering earlier in this passage. Peter’s point is that
Jesus suffered on the cross for the selfishness and rebellion of humanity. And
Jesus suffered on the cross for the right reasons-the just for the unjust, so
that He might bring us to God. Jesus lived the life we refused to live and died
the death that we deserved to die so He could bring His followers into the
presence of God as a result of them experiencing the forgiveness of sin and the
relationship with God that they were created for.
Now that leads to the first question that we need to ask
and answer, which is “what does Peter mean when he uses the phrase having been
put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit?” With this phrase Peter here is emphasizing
the two different states of Jesus existence. Peter is referring to Jesus
physical sphere of existence and His spiritual sphere of existence. Peter is
pointing followers of Jesus throughout history to Jesus crucifixion and
resurrection. Peter’s point to these early followers of Jesus who were
experiencing sadness and suffering is that just as Jesus emerged from suffering
and death into resurrection life, so would the followers of Jesus who were
reading his letter.
However, that leads us to verse 19, where Peter states
that Jesus, made alive in the spirit, “in which also He went and made
proclamation to the spirits now in prison,” Now several questions
immediately arise here: Where did Jesus go? What did Jesus proclaim? And who
were the spirits in prison? Now if you grew up in some church traditions, you
learned a creed that answered the question “Where did Jesus go” with the phrase
Jesus descended into Hell.
However, there are many problems with this answer. First,
the word that is used by Peter is not the one that is translated descend.
Instead it is the word that is translated go. However, this phrase first
appeared in the Apostle’s Creed in 400 A.D., when the church, at that time in
history, used its own traditional understanding of hell as being below and
inferred the going to be a descent. In addition, none of the titles used to
describe the place of the dead, or Hell that were used by the writers of the
New Testament are found in these verses. Finally, the place of the dead, or
Hell, is never referred to with the word prison. So then where is this prison
and who are the spirits? Peter helps provide an answer to that question in
verse 20. Let’s look at it again:
who once were
disobedient, when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah, during
the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were
brought safely through the water.
Peter explains that these spirits were once disobedient
during the days of Noah? So is he talking about human spirits or angelic
spirits? To answer that question, we
first need to understand the context of the days of Noah. We find this context
in Genesis 6:1-4:
Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and
daughters were born to them, 2 that the sons of God saw that the
daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever
they chose. 3 Then the LORD said, "My Spirit shall not strive
with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one
hundred and twenty years." 4 The Nephilim were on the earth in
those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters
of men, and they bore children to
them. Those were the mighty men who were
of old, men of renown.
One interpretation of these verses is that the sons of
God were fallen angels who took human wives and had children in open rebellion
against God. Now, while there are many questions about this passage and how it
is to be interpreted, it is immediately after these verses that we read the
account of the flood. However, in a non-biblical letter called the book of 1
Enoch, several chapters of this book were devoted to this event from
history.
The reason why this matters is that Peter and these
Jewish followers of Jesus would have been very familiar with the book of 1
Enoch. However, the book of 1 Enoch was lost after the 2nd century
until a copy was discovered in the 18th century. So, without the
information contained in 1 Enoch, interpreters read this text and interpreted
it using a different background, namely that of the Apostle’s creed that stated
that Jesus descended into Hell. In addition, Augustine and other church fathers
were far more concerned with the theological issues that this text could
address, not the meaning that Peter was trying to communicate to the readers of
his letter in the first century.
Another factor that we need to consider involves how
popular Noah and the story of 1 Enoch was in the 1st century. You
see, Noah was the most prominently known biblical figure in this region of the
world, even among Gentiles. His enduring fame is attested to by an amazing
series of Noah coins that were minted by five different Roman Emperors from
193-253 A.D. So the readers of this letter would be very familiar with the
story of Noah and the flood.
The readers
would have been familiar with the fact that it had never rained on the earth
before the flood. The readers of this letter would be very familiar with
the reality that it took Noah
approximately 75 years to build the ark. The readers of this letter would have
been very familiar with the fact that Noah had to trust God and the promises of
God in the face of criticism ridicule, and slander. Noah had to place his
confident trust in God and act on that trust in the midst of being mocked and
marginalized. “Hey did you hear what Noah’s doing. Noah’s building and ark
because God told him that it was going to rain and that there would be a flood.
What a loser!” Noah spent 75 years building what would serve to be a sign of
God’s judgment to those who rejected Him and a sign of grace to those who
trusted in Him.
You see, Peter brought Noah into this letter not because of a theological debate
over baptism or whether or not Jesus descended into Hell. Instead Peter brought
Noah into this letter so that he could connect the victory that Jesus
experienced over suffering, sin, and death on the cross and His subsequent
resurrection to the Noah tradition that was so popular and prominent in the
culture where the readers of this letter lived. In light of the tradition
surrounding the events that occurred immediately before the flood that are
recorded in the book of Genesis and the book of 1 Enoch, Peter explained that
the spirits that Christ preached to in prison were fallen angels and/or demonic
spirits and the spirits of their offspring.
So what did Jesus say to these spirits? Was it the gospel? I do not believe so. And the reason I do not
believe so is because of the connection that Peter is making between Jesus and
Noah. You see, both Enoch and his grandson Noah delivered a message of
condemnation to those directly involved in the evil that provoked the flood.
The very act of building the ark was a condemnation of the wicked generation in
which Noah lived.
The analogy Peter is making with Noah is that Jesus
delivered the final message of condemnation to the spirits when He ascended to
the throne of God. The confirmation is that the day of their impending and
eternal condemnation, that was first announced by the flood, is now upon them.
We see this reality revealed for us as Peter concludes this section of his
letter in verse 21:
Corresponding to that, baptism now
saves you-- not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a
good conscience-- through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who
is at the right hand of God, having gone into heaven, after angels and
authorities and powers had been subjected to Him.
Now an immediate reaction to these verses might be “Well
Dave isn’t this saying that baptism saves us from sin. I mean that seems to be
what Peter is saying here.” The reason why that is not what Peter is saying can
be seen from the verses itself and the context in which these verses are in.
First, did you notice what Peter immediately says after the phrase baptism now
saves you? There is a hyphen right. And right after the hyphen, Peter states “not
the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience”.
Then there is another hyphen right?
Now what happens when we read these verses without
reading the words between the hyphens? It reads this way: Corresponding to
that, baptism now saves you through the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Peter
here is not advocating for baptism as a requirement for salvation. Peter is not
concerned about arguing about theology as he is about addressing the current
circumstances of sadness and suffering that the readers of his letter were
experiencing.
And because of that reality, Peter continued to reinforce
the connection between Noah, Jesus, and these early followers of Jesus by
drawing an analogy between Noah’s deliverance from the floodwaters and
Christian baptism. Peter here is
connecting the sins of these angelic beings in the past that were recorded in
the book of Genesis and the book of 1 Enoch, the victorious proclamation of the
defeat of suffering, sin, and death by the risen Jesus, and the lives of these
early followers of Jesus who were reading his letter.
Peter used the flood as a type of God’s catastrophic
judgment, which happened only after God’s restrained patience. Peter paints the
survival of Noah as a word picture of the salvation that these followers of
Jesus would experience. The followers of Jesus who were reading this letter
were being encouraged by Peter that they would be among those who escape a
second flood of judgment because they have already passed through the waters of
Christian baptism as a result of identifying themselves with the life death and
resurrection of Jesus that rescued them from their rebellion.
Peter paints this word picture to explain that the God
who saved Noah as he suffered as a result of being mocked, marginalized, and
slandered, is the same God who will save these followers of Jesus as they
experience sadness and suffering. And it is here that Peter reveals for us the
reality that we respond to
suffering the right way when we follow the right examples.
As followers
of Jesus, we have the example of Jesus response to suffering. Jesus suffered as
one who was just for those who were unjust. Jesus suffered so that He could
bring His followers into the presence of God. And just as Jesus emerged from suffering and death into resurrection life, so
will those who trust in Him in the face of suffering.
And as followers
of Jesus, we have the example of Noah’s response to suffering. Noah suffered as
one who lived in a world corrupted by the selfishness, sin, and rebellion of
spiritual beings and humanity. Noah suffered as one who was mocked, ridiculed,
slandered and defamed for 75 years as he built an ark that proclaimed God's
message of condemnation. Noah’s suffering for faithfully following God resulted
in His rescue by God.
And the God who saved Noah as he suffered is the same God who will save
followers of Jesus from their suffering. There are times where God saves
followers of Jesus from their suffering. And there are times when God saves
followers of Jesus as they faithfully go through their suffering....
No comments:
Post a Comment