At the church where I serve we are in the
middle of a sermon series entitled Skeptic. During this series we are spending
our time looking at the eight common questions that skeptics pose as a
challenge to the Christian faith. And as we go through this series, our hope
and prayer is that we would address these eight common questions that skeptics
pose to challenge Christianity in way that answers these questions and that
equips us to have confidence and convictions about the nature and character of God
and His activity in the world around us.
This week I would
like for us to spend our time together addressing the sixth of these eight
common questions that those who are skeptical ask as a challenge to God and the
Christian faith. And that question is this: “How can
a loving God send people to Hell?"
Usually, when I engage someone who has this
skeptical question, the conversation goes something like this: “You Christians
say that God is love, but then you say that if I don’t believe in Jesus I am
going to Hell? How can God be a God of love and send people to place where they
will experience torment for all eternity? Why can’t you just stick to the
message of Jesus? After all Jesus accepted everybody. Jesus said, don’t judge
and you won’t be judged. So why can’t you Christians be more like Jesus”.
And if we were having a conversation about this
question, my answer to this question would be this. The reason why Hell is a
part of the message of Christianity is due to the fact that the idea of
standing before God to give an account of one’s life and be judged based on how
one lived their life was a part of the message and teaching of Jesus. As a
matter of fact, Jesus, who more than anyone reveals and explains the love of
God to the world, spoke more about standing before God to give an account of
one’s life and be judged based on how one lived their life more than any other
person in the letters that make up the Bible. For example, notice Jesus words
in Matthew 8:11-12:
"I say to
you that many will come from east and west, and recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of
heaven; 12 but the sons of the kingdom will be cast out into the
outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of
teeth."
Just a few chapters later, we see Jesus say the
following in Matthew 25:44-46:
"Then
they themselves also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see You hungry, or
thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care
of You?' 45 "Then He will answer them, 'Truly I say to you, to
the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do
it to Me.' 46 "These will go away into eternal punishment, but
the righteous into eternal life."
And then, here are Jesus words in another account of
Jesus life in the Bible, called the gospel of Mark, found in Mark 9:43-48:
"If your
hand causes you to stumble, cut it off; it is better for you to enter life
crippled, than, having your two hands, to go into hell, into the unquenchable
fire, 44 where THEIR WORM
DOES NOT DIE, AND THE FIRE IS NOT QUENCHED. 45 "If your
foot causes you to stumble, cut it off; it is better for you to enter life
lame, than, having your two feet, to be cast into hell, 46 where THEIR WORM DOES NOT DIE, AND THE FIRE
IS NOT QUENCHED. 47 "If your eye causes you to stumble,
throw it out; it is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye,
than, having two eyes, to be cast into hell, 48 where THEIR WORM
DOES NOT DIE, AND THE FIRE IS NOT QUENCHED.
You see, when we read the message and teaching of
Jesus, we see that Jesus made it unmistakably clear that every human being
would be judged on how they lived their life and would be held accountable for
how they lived their life. And part of that accountability would be the
consequence of being separated from God for eternity in a place called Hell,
where they would be punished for the wrongdoing and injustice that flowed from
their rebellion against God.
But why do people object to Jesus clear teaching on
the idea of being judged by how one lived their life? Why would people push
back so hard on the idea of God judging people and sending them to Hell? In my
experience in engaging people who have this question and objection, there seem
to be several grounds for their objection.
First, many people are offended simply by the notion
of judgment. Their objection, if aired in the courtyard coffeehouse, would
sound something like this: Well Dave, why should people have to stand before
God as their judge? Can’t God just accept everybody? After all, isn’t that what
love requires?”
If you find yourself resonating with this question
and objection, here would be my response: The timeless reality is that God is not only
love. God is also right, just, and good. And because God is right, just, and
good, God must not only love, He must also hate. He must hate that which is
evil and that which is contrary to what is right and just.
To say God has no right to exercise His right and
just response to evil is to simultaneously say He has no love, for you cannot
divorce those two ideas. Here is an illustration from my life to demonstrate
this point:
If, in May of 1998, if you would have asked me if I
could kill a man with my hands, I would be like, “Why would I ever want to kill
a man with my bare hands?” Then, on May 16, 1998, we had our daughter Rachel.
Now, after holding my newborn daughter in my arms, if you would have asked me
the exact same question, my response would be “Yeah, I’d kill a man”. What
happened? What gave birth to such a response in my heart? Love did, that I
loved this little girl so much that I will choke the life out of you if you try
to harm her.
You see, love and a right and just response to evil
cannot be taken from one another. If you take one, you lose the other. If God
is not a God of rightness and justice, then there is nothing He loves enough to
incite anger, and that’s important. That means there is no love. You can’t make
God a sky fairy God of love and try to take from him His right and just
response to evil, wrongdoing, and injustice.
In addition, while we may object to the idea of some
final judgment, it is the idea of a final judgment that gives dignity to our
lives. God doesn’t judge dogs, or even cats, although they should be judged.
Unlike any other earthly creature, God treats us as responsible moral agents,
because we were created to be responsible. God’s judgment also reveals the
reality that we have been created for a life of meaning and purpose in
relationship with God and relationship with others. How we treat God and others matter, because
every human being has been created in the image of God.
Second, people object to Jesus clear teaching on the
idea of being judged by how one lived their life because of the basis or
standard that they are judged on. Usually, when I engage someone who has this
skeptical question, the conversation goes something like this: “Why is it that
if I don’t believe in Jesus I am going to Hell? What does Jesus have to do with
it anyways?”
If you find
yourself resonating with this question and objection, here would be my
response: The
basis or standard that people face at the end of their lives is not about
whether or not one believes in Jesus.
The basis or standard is whether or not a person rejected God and did
things out of that rejection that hurt God and others.
You see, when we talk about what the Bible calls
sin, sin is a selfish love that places ourselves above God and others and
chooses to rebel and reject God and others. It is our selfishness and rebellion
that leads us to do things that hurt God and others. And it is that selfishness
and rebellion that separates us from God, because we really never wanted God to
be first in our life. Instead we want to be first in our life.
C.S. Lewis put it this way: Sin is a human being
saying to God throughout their life “Go away and leave me alone”. Hell is God’s
answer “You may have what you wish”. Now it is not like people wake up in the
morning and choose to go to Hell; they simply choose the road that leads them
there as they refuse the rescue that is found in the life, death, and
resurrection of Jesus.
Hell is the culmination of the effects of
selfishness and rebellion and the confirmation of God’s opposition to it. Hell
is the end result of human choice and the judgment of God. There can be no
fairer verdict than that.
Here is something to consider: After all, if you did
not want Jesus when you lived life here on earth, wouldn’t it be Hell to have
to spend eternity with Jesus? That would be Hell, right? For example, Heaven is
a place of constant praise and worship of God. But for those who do not want to
be with God and who do not enjoy one hour of worship a week on earth, it would
be hell to force them to do this forever in Heaven, wouldn’t it?
A similar objection surrounding what Jesus and the
letters that make up the Bible have to say about the idea of being judged by
how one lived their life because of the basis or standard that they are judged
on sounds something like this: “What about the pygmy in Africa who never heard
about the Bible or Jesus? How can God judge them and find them guilty?”
If you find yourself resonating with this question
and objection, I want to let you know that you are raising a fair question or
objection. And your question and objection is not a new question or objection.
As a matter of fact, we see the Apostle Paul address this very objection in a
section of a letter that is recorded for us in the New Testament of the Bible
called the book of Romans.
Tomorrow we will jump into this section of the book
of Romans...
No comments:
Post a Comment