This
week, we have been asking the question "What kind of government is the
right government? Does Jesus promote socialism? Communism? A monarchy?
Democracy? A republic?" So far this week, we have discovered that humanity was divinely designed to live in relationship with God and
one another and have been given responsibility over the earth as His
representative here on earth.
We talked about the reality that
while there is no single verse that we can point to that says “Thus saith the
Lord, you shall be governed by X type of government”, there are biblical
principles that support some form of a government that is chosen by the people
who are being governed. Now a natural question or objection that could arise
here is “Well Dave, didn’t the Jewish people have kings over them? Didn’t God
give the Jewish people a procedure when it came to having a king? So how can
you say that the Bible supports some form of a government that is chosen by the
people who are being governed? ”
Today,
to respond to this question or objection, let’s look at an event from history
that is recorded for us in the Bible called the book of 1 Samuel, where the
Jewish people asked for a king to rule them. At this time in history, a prophet
named Samuel was leading the Jewish people, as the Lord’s spokesman and
representative. However, as Samuel neared the end of his life, his children
were not following in his faithful footsteps when it came to their relationship
with God. It is in this context that we see the following event from history
take place in 1 Samuel 8:4-20:
Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at
Ramah; and they said to him, "Behold, you have grown old, and your sons do
not walk in your ways. Now appoint a king for us to judge us like all the
nations." But the thing was displeasing in the sight of Samuel when they
said, "Give us a king to judge us." And Samuel prayed to the LORD.
The LORD said to Samuel, "Listen to the voice of the people in regard to
all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have
rejected Me from being king over them. "Like all the deeds which they have
done since the day that I brought them up from Egypt even to this day-- in that
they have forsaken Me and served other gods-- so they are doing to you also.
"Now then, listen to their voice; however, you shall solemnly warn them
and tell them of the procedure of the king who will reign over them." So
Samuel spoke all the words of the LORD to the people who had asked of him a
king. He said, "This will be the procedure of the king who will reign over
you: he will take your sons and place them
for himself in his chariots and among his horsemen and they will run
before his chariots. "He will appoint for himself commanders of thousands
and of fifties, and some to do
his plowing and to reap his harvest and to make his weapons of war and
equipment for his chariots. "He will also take your daughters for perfumers
and cooks and bakers. "He will take the best of your fields and your
vineyards and your olive groves and give them
to his servants. "He will take a tenth of your seed and of your
vineyards and give to his officers and to his servants. "He will also take
your male servants and your female servants and your best young men and your
donkeys and use them for his
work. "He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become
his servants. "Then you will cry out in that day because of your king whom
you have chosen for yourselves, but the LORD will not answer you in that
day." Nevertheless, the people refused to listen to the voice of Samuel,
and they said, "No, but there shall be a king over us, that we also may be
like all the nations, that our king may judge us and go out before us and fight
our battles."
So here is a
question to consider: was a monarchy God’s idea? Was a form of government where
government ruled over people without their consent God’s idea? No a monarchy, a
king, was what the people asked for out of their selfish rebellion against God.
And as a result, God gave the selfish and rebellious Jewish people what they
wanted. And how did a king work out for the Jewish people? How has a monarchy,
a dictatorship, communism, or socialism worked out for humanity historically?
A Biblical
worldview reveals that, because we live in a flawed and fallen world as a
result of the selfishness and rebellion of humanity, governments
should establish a strong and clear separation of powers. Because of the
selfishness and rebellion of humanity, even Godly leaders can abuse power. In
the letters that make up the Bible we see several examples of this reality.
For example, Saul repeatedly put
his own interests first. King David misused his power in his sin with
Bathsheba. Solomon wrongfully accumulated 700 wives and 300 concubines that
turned his heart towards rebellion. As a matter of fact, most of the kings of
the Jewish people abused their power and did evil.
And because of that reality, there
should be some type of separation of powers within government. Even in the
church, power and decisions were never given to just one person. You see, when you read the letters that make up the Bible, what we
discover is that government seems to work best when people have consent when it
comes to who governs them. By contrast, the letters of the Bible reveal for us
the reality that governments work the worst for those who govern and rule
without the people’s consent.
Now another
question that could arise here is “Well Dave, if what you are saying is true;
if the Bible supports some form of a government that
is chosen by the people who are being governed, then what should the
relationship be between the church and government? What does a Biblical
worldview look like when it comes to how the government relates to the church
and vice versa?
Wayne Grudem does a great job of
addressing this question and in so doing reveals for us four principles for a
right relationship between government and the church. First, as we discovered last
week, the Church Should Not Govern "The Things That Are Caesar's” so to speak.
In other words, the church should have no responsibility in local or national
government. There is no indication in the New Testament that church leaders had
any responsibility in local or empire wide government. In addition, Jesus refused to assume any type
of governmental role. This principle implies that the Popes in the Middle Ages
were wrong to attempt to assert authority over kings, or claim a right to
select civil leaders.
Second and similarly, the Civil
Government Should Not Govern "The Things That Are God's”. In other words,
the government should have no responsibility when it comes to church. Jesus and
the early church were involved in evaluating and selecting leaders for the
church, not the government. Third, civil government should support and encourage
churches and legitimate religious groups in general. As long as the government
is not supporting a single religion or denomination, it is appropriate to
support religious institutions with things such as tax-exempt status, as it
falls under the government promoting the general welfare of the nation, as we
talked about in the first sermon in the series in Romans 13:4.
The fourth principle, however, is
that the most difficult church/government questions arise when people disagree
over whether something belongs to the realm of the church or the realm of the
government. And for the rest of this series, we will find these principles at
work as we begin to lay out the political platform that Jesus would have if He
was running for political office in our culture today.
In the meantime, however, the
timeless truth that we discover today is that, as followers of Jesus, we are to
support some form of a government that is chosen by the people who are being
governed. As followers of Jesus, we are to support a government that is chosen
by the people who are governed because every human being is created in God’s relational image and bears the
thumbprint of God as His representative here on earth. As
followers of Jesus, we are to support a government that is chosen by the people
who are governed because, because no
human being has a special right to rule over others
without their consent.
As followers of Jesus, we are to
support a government that is chosen by the people who are governed because
human beings have an inward bent towards selfishness and rebellion that can
result in the abuse of power if not kept in check. And as followers of Jesus,
we are to support a government that is chosen by the people who are governed
because those who are governed are best suited to choose who should fulfill the
purpose of government to promotes good for people and punishes the evil of
people.
No comments:
Post a Comment